Where is the repression coming from? The object of desire. Consequently, it doesn't make sense to talk about slips with someone that you're not sexually attracted to. I think I addressed the wrong statement you made in my haste.
So, where would the repression come from if the object of desire is not present and not on the person's mind? A time where you are talking to someone you are not sexually attracted to.
So you're saying if the object of her desire (let's use her as an example) is not physically present, and she's talking to someone else who she is not attracted to, then said object of desire cannot cross her mind?
Really?
Naw. That's not my point at all. I'll address it in your second question.
Where is the repression coming from? The object of desire. Consequently, it doesn't make sense to talk about slips with someone that you're not sexually attracted to.
Another thing to think about:
Is the object of desire the source of the repression?
If not, then what (or who) IS the source of the repression?
Who is the source of repression. If there is no spoon, and I'm the one bending then what does that mean for repression. Repression can come from two different sources. My gut just gave me a huge spike when I started talking about this shit. Anyway, repression has a cause. The cause must originate from somewhere. The act of repressing initiates in the bended spoon that does not exist.
The mechanism to cause repression is the mindset that wills itself to bend. For example, if I tell a woman not to call me sexy and instead address me by my name. Better yet, if I tell a woman that is making outlandish claims like I want to fuck to get her mind out of the gutter then what has changed from my mindset from point 0. From point 0 to point 1, where I make a statement.
I have decided that the issue needs suppressing.
I have decided that now is not the time and place to take up such issue. I haven't said no to the woman or person. I'm reclaiming territory and boundary and space. Consequently, my thoughts of suppressing are
reflected (I feel like I'm reaching to explain myself) in what I think is a mirror in the other person. They repress because I supress.
So, it makes sense to me that we would see the accidental-on-purpose leakage when confronted with a person that is supressing the issue to a person that is repressing the issue. However, I think the repression is less likely to show it's enduring form unless the person that the woman is not attracted to can supress in the same manner as the original person.
This is just my 2 cents because I know I don't fully understand repression, but I think there must be a balance for everything.
Repression in the desirer seems like the reflective balance to suppression in the object of desire.
Hopefully this makes some sense.