Sexiness has NOTHING to do with physical attractiveness...much like you can feel threatened by an animal/insect no matter what size it is.
^^THIS^^ Also, this is a really cool way of looking at it - when I get these 'vibes', it seems like something in her being, and she doesn't even have to be conscious of this - she probably isn't - is saying "yeah nothing we're talking about has to do with attraction or sex, and I don't even need to have sex all the time or even just with you or be a nympho or anything, i'm just like anyone else - HOWEVER, if we happen to go in the direction of sex, YOU BETTER BE READY FOR WHAT'S COILED UP WITHIN ME, WAITING TO SPRING."
Here's a personal centerpiece of the thing for me:
There's more than enough in the whole sexuality/biology thing that you can turn to as a source of POWER and confidence as a man
There are also some aspects of it that you can interpret from a place of WEAKNESS and limitation.
The x factor is you.
Very true. But also I think this may apply to all the aspects, ie each aspect can empower or demotivate you depending on where you're coming from. And in my opinion, the belief in the "fuck them all, as much and as quickly as possible simply for the sake of fucking wiring like a guy has" is an example. Yes, it has definite biological roots that CANNOT be denied, and at my advanced age (late '30's) I still meet this urge, but it doesn't even seem like a reality to me anymore - I guess i've been transmuting so long that it's not an issue. Look at it like this - you sneeze in response to external stimuli beyond your control, and you don't even try to repress it. But does it take over your life? And you can even repress the sneeze to get on with something crucial that you're doing so you don't fuck it up, and let it out once the task is done.......
Similarily, the knowledge of women's carnal appetites HAS actually been a source of weakness OR power for me at various times, and it always depends on the frame of mind i'm in at the moment. Sometimes my mood is "so then why won't they just let it go and let me fuck them? I hate them for being so deceitful and withholding.", and sometimes it's "God, they must be miserable. Poor fuckers - I pity them." Kidd!! has said something to this effect numerous times in the earlier posts, I believe....... But my favourite mood of them all is "It is what it is, fuck it. My life is great anyway. I wonder what's showing at the cinema tonight?"
I agree that a fundamental point is being missed here
Indeed it is.
Now to decide on what that point is.
My head has gone in so many directions during this thread that this seems like a monumental task, especially since I think that even when I said the above I was referring to something else, but my gut just told me that as far as i'm concerned, the main point is that
a) women have a greater capacity for sexuality than men, and most men (and probably most women too) nowadays are not aware of this, and
b) this was known in times of antiquity: maybe the knowledge wasn't widespread becuase I suspect that women have always discouraged total understanding of their gender (probably even from themselves - and this may have to do with yin/yang again - the masculine seems to be about not just logic, but picking shit apart and understanding it and the feminine would be PRESUMABLY averse to this - although they love to be armchair psychologists and pick us and one another apart, so I could be wrong here

), but it surely wasn't as arcane a knowledge as it is in modern times. When I read the story of Tiresius a couple years back, this was my feeling, and I kept my mouth shut because I felt as if women would crucify me for revealing this

. Actually, the real reason is that I really don't think most men are ready to hear this, and even if they can accept it, they are nowhere near comfortable enough with sexuality to be able to do anything constructive with this knowledge anyway. To my mind, if you go into a sexual situation with a woman with no ulterior motive and with present moment awareness, she'll let you in on this "secret" without having to explain anything

......
By the way, a lot of Greek stories (and I am by no means an expert) seem to point to many of the "hidden truths" that are talked about in this forum. The examples from "The Odyssey" given in Chinweizu's book are a good example, and Salmacis' (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salmacis) deballing of Hermaphroditus is another great tale (he wasn't born sexless - he became so after he bathed in her fountain with her and she merged with him, making him sexless). Reading between the lines, my take on it is that it simply warns of the dangers of letting a woman have her way (WANTS) with you - you will lose your own gender (and we all know what happens then

).
They hunt in packs now. Ensuring that both left and right exits are blocked, the Queen Bee approaches from the front with her hands slightly outstretched with the group surrounding you in a semi circle.
Variations of this type of behaviour with no shame now exists (such as grabbing you by the wrists and pulling you in, particularly if you're small enough) as long as prior approval is given by esteemed member(s).
I have no experience with this, as I tend to make a sharp exit when groups of women get into a 'feeding frenzy' directed towards me (I presume it's these kinds of situations you're referring to?), but I will say that the generalisation of a woman having less upper body strength than a man goes out the fucking window when they are aroused

.
@ Meraki:
In fact, one of the many diamonds in the rough that I found during my perusal of PUA theory was that a man's sexual arousal is like an on/off switch (and we know what triggers the 'off' state), where a woman's is like a dimmer switch, and I find even this to be a gross oversimplification, based on my experiences.
And also:
(ie a graph showing a woman's sexual arousal level over time and circumstance,