Natural Freedom

Power: dominating people is a natural function of society that garners all its borders.

http://www.fragmentsweb.org/fourtx/powovrtx.html Make no mistake this is not a sad phenomenon. What this tells you is that you can possibly wield this magnificent vehicle. Let us continue and exam how and why.

http://www.fragmentsweb.org/TXT2/reciprtx.html Note the use of the word reciprocal. Reciprocity is only understood as mutuality. What you have here then is a mechanism of significant use. What I mean is that you can control reciprocity. The inner workings of the human are not designed to be able to continually withstand lack of reciprocation. For example, you say hi to a person who never say hi to you back, and after a while you unconsciously stop saying hi to that person. Controlling reciprocity is crucial because the lack of this force makes people reject. The use of this force creates acceptance. Over abundance of reciprocity rejects, and of course the calculated use of reciprocity and disuse of reciprocity creates catastrophic brain damage, which forces a person to cling to the institution or person who played this mind game with them. Note that reciprocity is temporal. For instance, we all get mad at the guy who doesn't pay us back fast enough, and we subsequently mistrust him. Use this tool wisely.

Let's continue analyzing power. We come to the base emotion equation of human survival when faced with fear, fight or flight.

http://www.fragmentsweb.org/fourtx/powfertx.html
Fear is one of our strongest emotions and one of the hardest to control and disperse. Understanding fear and how it works in people is crucial. Fear stems from lack. This can be lack of courage, lack of motivation, lack of understanding. Note that overcoming fear is difficult. The prudent man chooses to fight back his fears and flee in only the most extreme cases. Let's get dark. How do we create fear in a person. We control them overtly with weapons or tools, or we can chose to surreptitiously implant false needs and wants in them. For example, I tell a guy I'm going to give him 10,000 dollars and show the case to him upfront; however, I tell him that I have to go to the bathroom or do something that takes me away from the area, and I tell him to wait. What do you think the chances are that this man follows me or starts looking for me in the next five minutes? We must note fear is quantifiable. That same man would not chase you for a dollar. The application to women is immediately clear. Our sets of values and standards that she likes creates a space for her to allocate emotions to use. After having a good conversation and great interaction, having lots of touching involved with the female while talking, walk away and see how fast that fear of losing you has motivated her to re-establish your conversation and connection. Walking away is powerful. Use it wisely.

I'm going to take you a little deeper.

Violence and power do not match. They are opposite ends of the spectrum.

http://www.fragmentsweb.org/fourtx/pow_vitx.html
Ask yourself how society initiated itself and more people will tell you that it was through social cooperation. This bullshit is prevalent among PUA histories describing men and women. The real way that society was established is through mob action. Violence is only possible where there is fear, hostility, prejudice, or judgmental attitudes. It was through the mythologizing of fear about nature, wild animals, and other violent people that groups banded together to thwart these issues. I'm too lazy right now to give you more resources, but simple logic tells you that the physical construction of human beings was not made for massive predatory hunting. No, we ritualized killing that which violently stood against us. First animals and then human beings. The mythological ritual leads us to imbibe the blood and meat of the vanquished, animals or savages. Do you see why cannibalism arose in certain cultures? Society was furnished with bodies, martyrs, and victims who stood against those who wished to control by the sword.

How do we use violence in our favor? Here, I will teach you another thing you need to know about your human instincts. Have you ever been with a person who crying? Sure you have. If you're a healthy human being asked if they want to talk about it and offered help. Realize that this is a natural instinct. Why? Because in our genetic code there are memories that associate crying with physical ailment. I'm not going to ask you to indulge in helping lots of crying people; rather, I ask that you give them assurance. We won't tell them that it won't happen again, but we assure that person of the physical prowess and defense capabilities subtly. That's what allows them to heal. This is why the ideology of nationalism was born. It was the assurance that you are apart of the group. The way you go about giving assurance is simple. Tell the person "you're a pretty strong person for [blank]". What ever the issue is you can use that phrase. Why do I only say this phrase? It is due to the fact that we are hardwired to accept, trust, and respect words that align with power. People are so selfish right? The next time you see a person stressed try out what I mean and see what happens. They'll probably qualify their self to you and do some approval seeking shit. Remember violence comes in many forms: social, physical, psychological, emotional etc.

I'm a pretty sick guy right? On to the next one. Why people bow down to your magnificence.
http://www.fragmentsweb.org/TXT2/p_srevtx.html
The lists of reason are that people obey are pretty obvious. I'm just giving a primer on power in human interactions. I'll keep a thread running about power with short essays on practical application to people and its consequences. To this day, I have not found a book the quantifies the elements and tools of power; however, I am working on compiling my thoughts on power from the books I have read and I'll come up with some theory that you can easily apply to people. You can essentially learn everything you need to know about power from watching people, but your learning is much faster if you understand how power works explained simply and try to replicate it yourself. To be honest, I'm writing this more for myself than for anyone else because I've always been interested in this aspect of humanity along with about of other stuff concerned with institutions and the way they work.

Some of the faces of power.


space

we will take a look at a great quote from author Allen Feldman Foucault's point is east for us to see. The pure movement of a body through space constructs multiple moving sites of domination. Space is inherently tied to the object/subject moving through it. In this case people. For example, if you have ever noticed a guy who looks down when you pass by him then you see how a site of domination is constructed. Expand that issue to women looking down and you begin to see the picture. However, this isn't useful in determining how to use space without understanding where the hierarchy comes from. The ebbs and flows of space, analyzing this piece line by line, show the way in which these transfers occur. Meeting a person at a restaurant, going to work, the libary, and eating all construct transfers of space and power. So now we come to managing using space.

Commanding space requires using your eye's effectively. Look peripherally instead of directly. Directly is confrontational. It communicates too much power. We must be subtle. Knowing your surrounding is crucial, read mental maps, understanding exits and entrances gives you power because as you take notice with your senses you become acutely aware of those people, women, transgressing space norms. If a girl goes through a door more than twice in an hour you can bet she's trying to give you power as a 'gatekeeper'. She's envisioning you as the guard and master of authority. She wants your approval. Don't believe me then speak to her. This goes the same with trash cans, computers, books, and anything else that could require approval. Basically it's all objects.

Spatial competance and performance are easy to analyze. The norm of space is to give space. The reduction of space is intrusive. It is giving. It asks for receiving. Holding static space then is the answer when a female bumps into you or 'accidentally' caresses you. Understand that when space norms are broken near you that you have power. Compliance is the resistance to the power of space. Breaking the space norms with resistance indicate an attempt to uphold the space standards. You'll see what I mean if a female says sorry as softly as possible with puppy dog eyes looking at you. Even better still her silence when she bumps into you gives you a gauge that she made a real accident or that she is very determined. What I mean is that she may be trying to jock you rudely, which is sometimes a good thing, or she didn't notice your presence at all. Going line by line still, the bathroom is a good example of a defiling space. Waste and pollution go to the lavatories. This separation of space creates a hierarchy. I.E. the inversion of the private with the public; thus, because we have established a public space for private action (using the bathroom) we have created an area in the public sphere which has status. For example, after going to the bathroom if the person does not wash their hands and they let a person know they are defiled they are rebuked. In the same manner, after going to the bathroom and cleaning their self they are allowed in to the public hierarchy and take their normal status. In effect the bathroom is of lower status because it is privileged to be so closely accommodated to higher public space attached to it. This is why public restroom are not highly thought of.

The same situation applies to all spaces. It goes public sphere, private area in public sphere, mutual place of interest, personal place of interest, and finally your house and your bedroom at the top of the hierarchy. Never forget that your bedroom is highest of the high. It is the shit. You can create imagined space when talking. Use silence and ignore a person. You'll see how that technique falls into place.

You can also do the same thing by pushing a person. While you increase the physical distance between you and the other person you have not increased the mental distance, in fact, if done violently, you two are mentally closer because of the similarity in mental states. Playfully pushing a person however creates mental space. Notice how quick the are to walk back into the spot that you pushed them from. It is because you took power from them, and were joking with them so it is accidental. They move back to the spot because holding space static, unchanging, is more powerful than reduction of space or increasing space. Try it on a few women. As in all cases, we come to final part. Space representation and practice do not solely determine power. There are many elements especially when it comes to domination of other people.

If you're reading I hope you enjoy this article and can start to see some extra practical applications which I have not mentioned.

Note: space reduction can be used as a tool of power when it is combined with linguistic spatial re-presentation, simply creating space with language. when space reduction is combined with spatial or linguistic staticness, unchanging, the same effect is achieved.


The next topics will "get rude" or "get polite", "projection", "repression", "mystery/statements", "teasing/perversion", "presentation/re-presentation", "suppresion", "Firing", and "transgression/regression"

Presentation/Re-presentation

I don't have any quotes for this post as I lack the necessary books to quote from right now.

We'll use fun examples. Presentation is powerful; presentation is power. A quick example demonstrates my point. Rain versus snow. Most people dislike rain; however, most people like snow. Snow and rain are the same thing. They are just different first person presentations. It is the usability and aesthetic presence of snow that trumps the unusable annoying rain. Snow is silent. We already understand how silence gives power. Rain is loud and distracting. Snow presents itself as a possible distraction rather than going through the act of distracting. In the former case, rain announces itself through its lack of silence and tact. Snow often goes unnoticed. How many times have you looked outside your window if you didn't catch the weather to be surprised that it was snowing?

Presentation then as a first person experience is very important. It is common knowledge that first impressions make the difference when you're meeting people. A better idiom is that, "It's not what you say. It's how you say it." We can apply presentation to women. Walking and talking with snap and swagger is a lot more likely to attract and hold attention than dragging your feet mumbling and slinking around. Practicing ways of effective presentation that are concise and interesting are in the prototype pimps best interest.

Great pimps and macks aren't known for their awesome game. They are known for their awesome presentation of their game. Knowing slang, ebonics, and cool quotes and phrases doesn't necessarily help you; although, the pickup community would have you believe otherwise. I will say having a strong grasp of language, knowing slang, ebonics, quotes, cool phrases, idioms, and euphemisms does not hurt. What counts is the energy, method, communication, and most importantly your 'stream of consciousness'. Great writers and speakers practice their 'stream of consciousness' all the time. This is how they write great books, conduct interviews, and capture the attention of people.

The 'stream of consciousness' is an element that is underdeveloped in many people. You'll see these people using filler words such as like, um, and, and whole plethora of extraneous phrases that they need not use. Practicing your 'stream of consciousness' is simple. Write, read, talk, and when you get the chance improvise on topics of conversation that you don't know about. This is your bullshitter weapon. Having a well practiced 'stream of consciousness' allows you not only to bullshit about many things, but it also prepares you for times when you don't know what to say to women. That is crucial. Pratting a female up, also known as giving her the runaround, is a tactic that is necessary until the person develops full competence. Pratting a female up is also a useful tool even when you have competence because effective pratting can destroy a females mind or blow her ego up so much that it might never come down. Finally the 'stream of consciousness' is useful for effective and aesthetic presentation; it is also the prerequisite for checking a female effectively.


Re-presentation will be posted later.

Re-presentation/Presentation continued

Re-presentation is the act of presenting something a second time. Re-presentation's can be very diverse. For example, re-presentations of money are cars, clothes, homes, pools, garages, toys, etc. The powerful nature of re-presentation is that it is symbolic. Rarely do we associate presentations with re-presenations, but we implicitly see the connection as with the garages example. A re-presentation of snow and rain would be a flood, typhoon, monsoon, hurricane, tsunami. The difference between snow and rain from these other acts of nature is the method of delivery rather than appreciable characteristic of image. A tsunami is a collective of water that rises from the ground rather than falling from the sky. We'll get to the effects of re-presentations later. What we need to understand immediately is that while snow and rain are image driven first person experiential occurrences tsunamis are not. I must make a caveat here; tsunamis are experiential but they are not first person. We don't know where the water came from before it meets us on the shoreline. It could have been rain or snow that created the pool of water which sieges the shore. Experientially, we see the body of water rising, ready to fall, but it comes from a different mode of communication, the ocean or the sea. A better example of presentation versus re-presentation is in talking. If I say that I'm fun it is different from my friend saying that I'm fun. The first person and experiential element of first personess is missing. The method of communication is different, note the friend saying.

This is where the power of re-presentations lie. They create impactful corroborations of what can already be seen. Note the effect that the media has had on society. Every person thinks that crime rates are higher than ever in the United States when they are really at historical lows. Because re-presentations are so powerful, diverse, and plentiful they can change a person's perspective. This is why all celebrities have groupies. The media re-presents them and adds value statements like George Clooney is cool, sexy, or fun. We are implicitly taught to believe re-presentations because we see them symbolically everday; thus, the accompanying value statements in re-presentations are believed because the re-presentation as an image and symbol is factually true.

We can use re-presentations to our advantage. The first way is to speak of a re-presentation through presentation. I can say, "Yeah, I guess I'm fun. My friends keep telling me that I'm a riot." A better way is to have a friend say that you're a riot. Still we have an even better way. With the advent of cell phones coupled with cameras, we can show physical images that are factually true which implicitly demonstrate that we are a riot. I'm not saying carry around pictures with you all the time, but if you have smartphone on you then you are not at a disadvantage. As a matter of fact, you can easily create power over another female by linking in the images in the regular flow of conversation. Often times women ask if you have a job. If you like your job then showing her a re-presentation of you working or being at work with a female friend hugged up on you is best. All you have to say is, "I can show better than I can tell you." Great re-presentations which are already advocated here are clothes, cars, and homes. Financial prudence and management can serve a person well.

One of the most normal and strongest re-presentations of power that get women going is interruption. If you're a social person and you go to a place that you know well then you're golden. I strongly advocate it for the man who loves having power. In the space article, you can take the notion of establishing territory (reference distance) to your advantage. The benefit of going to a place where you are well known and consistently have friends is that the female will never be able to establish manners power (see get rude or get polite), social power, spacial power, or linguistic power (silence, ambivalence, spatial etc). As a matter of fact, these tools will work to her disadvantage because you will automatically be using all of them yourself. This effect is doubled if you go into a place where everyone knows you and likes you, but you don't frequent the place a lot. Read frequent as more than one time every two weeks. This effect is stronger since your spatial absence leaves a need for the dominant majority of people to come greet and meet with their buddy. If you do this properly you'll be interrupted often enough where you can't establish solo conversation, frequent enough where she is introducing herself to at least a couple of people per hour, and strong enough for her to question why so many people are coming to talk to you.

The best part is that this is a passive tactic and one you do not need to think about. All you have to do is lock-down a joint and talk to lots of people in the establishment. Hold 15 minutes conversations with most people and they remember you. A good nickname that isn't heard fairly often helps too. Show up two weeks later and bingo you have joint locked down for any female in there and female you bring with you.

The next topics will "get rude" or "get polite", "projection", "repression", "mystery/statements", "teasing/perversion", "suppresion", "Firing", "warnings", and "transgression/regression"

That article was really interesting. Thanks for sharing

_________________
"The heart is deep beyond all things, and it is the man. Even so, who can know him."

Always Drink Fresh Blood

http://www.thegmanifesto.com/2009/11/al ... blood.html

The novel female is a good female. A fresh slate is very powerful.

With most women, if you fuck up, it's better to just find a new female.

Women are like buses. If you miss the first one another is coming in right after her.

This is a telling symbol of power. When you truly believe and have this mindset women

will know to play less games with you; however, having this mindset does not

guarantee obedience.

For your pleasure.

Transgression/Regression

Transgression
Transgression is a concept that I was thankfully taught about in school. From my interactions with females I never had developed or learned the concept. Transgression is a movement across, breaking barriers and fields etc.

So, we can see ways that this applies to women. Transgression assumes and is basically synonymous with interest. What I mean is that you will never have a female transgress your boundaries or principles without a reason tied to you. The ways the female may go about transgressing shit are bumping into you, personal space transgression, talking to you first, verbal space transgression, and gripping and clenching you.

Gripping and clenching is interesting. It communicates command. The female realizes she doesn't have power over you, but she is abiding by a certain command. The command doesn't mean something that is specifically spoken all the time. Command is the presence and order of things that have passed and have yet to be passed. A female will submit to the command of the relationship. Her physical gripping and clenching are not those physical acts, per se, but they do constitute the range of actions I'm talking about. A quick list of clenching/gripping acts follows as stealing kisses, pulling you into a room, grabbing your belt, hugging you immediately without your reciprocation when she sees you, etc. The female acts out commands of obedience to transgress the psycho-social boundaries erected by you and society. Sometimes transgression can also mean disobedience. If you make a principle stick by it. Transgressing the boundary in this way is only meant to test and obey the power of command and the biological power of the subject being acted on.

Regression
Regression is the exact opposite of transgression. Regression is a moving away and erection of opposing boundaries and principles. Sometimes this can be seen as the erection of physical space and expansion of distance. A strong act of regression is when a female decides to leave your room after you have allowed her to stay. If you didn't kick her out then it counts as regression.

Most times, if a female is regressing it is not because she doesn't like you. This only counts when you are pimping right. If you are pimping right then the situation will be followed by transgression. She creates a negative barrier and erects distance or sets boundaries only to have a reason to transgress deeper on the male body. She does this because of the absence of meaning in appearances of social roles. In today's age it doesn't mean anything to be male or female. I'm philosophizing, but the point is to note the seduction that she has with appearances. The appearance of a strong and dominant male seduces her to act in the command of subordinate female. This goes deep into our history as social creatures and our prehistory as humans.

Thus, regression is only a preparatory stage for the female that is interested in you. It is a process just like transgression. The social effects that it should incite like feelings of distance and not wanting the male are not produced because the female wants to transgress, but she knows that she must regress first to be able to intimately communicate the velocity and force of the transgression, basically how much she wants you.

For example, you go to a party and the female that is interested in you takes your number and leaves. She then proceeds to text you later in the night saying she needs to see you. This move is only possible if she can regress to set the stage for obedience to the general command and power relationship.


Notes:

Both ideas that I'm talking about correlate to space, but they are vastly different from an understanding of space. Transgression and regression are specifically bound up in the velocity, forcefulness, and character of the action. They signify direction of space and movement through immaterial conditions imposed by society and the two people interested in each other. Strong boundaries are necessary to give force to the seduction process in the dominated body.

It must be noted that the individual creating command and power, since both women and men can do this, does not transgress or regress. Only the individual lacking power does this. Transgression and regression are just something to look for. Also, for simplicity, we can characterize regression as transformative resistance. What I mean is that regression changes the relationship to power, opening the door to transgression and obedience; however, transgression is not synonymous with obedience. Transgression merely marks acts on the body in material and immaterial space fields. I should explain my thoughts a little further. Transgression doesn't necessarily mean obedience because you may not have told the woman in question to hug you or to do what ever she did. She is obeying and enforcing the command of the relationship. So her aggression or actions are only a mark of interpreting the command of the relationship and what her role should be.


The next topics will "get rude" or "get polite", "projection", "repression", "mystery/statements", "teasing/perversion", "presentation/re-presentation", "suppresion", "Firing",

Up next is 'Firing' that ho. More topics on power will be added as I remember them or research them.

The next topic is resistance. I'm compiling an abridged essay from Andrea Brighenti.

I just want to say I appreciate your time and effort, it's good read.. Go on

Resistance

Power-Canetti and Foucault on resistance
Andrea Brighenti

An abridged essay (You want the meat not the seasoning)
I'm doing a quick analysis because I have to get back to some other work. Resistance always marks absence of power. Note that jokes, grumbling, dragging feet, etc. come into play. What we see then is a telling sign that an individual has power. Resistance is transformative. In the case of women, resistance on their part transforms the power relationship to the benefit of the man. If you let them know in the right way that you don't tolerate resistance then you'll be doing great; however, this only applies to visible resistance. If the female isn't answering your calls or doesn't give you her full attention then that means you have take action.

It should be easy to see how to do so for the specific situation. I'll give an example though. Say the female isn't giving you her full attention. She's creating that double negative for affirmation of the male having power. She's resisting giving attention invisibly, so she's resisting the interaction, thus the affirmation of those two points is to call your interaction to close. Simply, leave. She cannot protest and if she does protest then prat her up telling her that you have other commitments and subtly tell her that if she needs to put more effort in saying, "you seem out of it like you were thinking about something else, and I want to give you time to think about whatever you were thinking about." Remember, the secret is power with invisibility. You have to show her that you don't give a shit about the secret.

Resistance of any type acknowledges that you own the space.

Finally, I thought I would include the language bit because you can see why guys who have accents get bitches. They are resisting the power structure invisibly. They are fleeing the cultural imperialism of the state. They are taking flight from power invisibly. Most females only know how to address the power resistance overtly. Saying shit like, "where are you from? Why do you have that accent? You're different." They get play because the female falls prey to the resistance, but doesn't know how to challenge it. The corollary in men is disliking people with accents. If you haven't ever had this happen to you then you haven't lived long enough. Sometimes it's hard to understand the guy, but it's rude to call him out on that.

I also thought I should include a section on flight. Physical flight is covered in the Regression/Transgression section. Flight in enclosed spaces is different. I'm still researching that shit, and I'll be speaking in generalities about flight if offer analysis in enclosed spaces. I want to be able to give hardcore specifics.


The next topics will "get rude" or "get polite", "projection", "repression", "mystery/statements", "teasing/perversion", "presentation/re-presentation", "suppresion", "Firing", and "Flight"

Up next is 'Firing' that ho. More topics on power will be added as I remember them or research them.

In my haste to type up the essay and commentary. I left out a few sections that covered resistance and laughter as a part of resistance.

Laughter perverts the dominating social structure. It acts as a pure form of resistance to power and creates a reversal.

Use laughter wisely and with discretion. Lol, I meant use laughter widely and without discretion......

Yes the last sentence was a joke.

Firing that Ho

Firing a female is so simple. Use this tool of power wisely. When your boss fires you, there is a need for you to get another job. The same goes for women. Firing a female who doesn't act correctly but is interested in you is a very powerful way to get her to behave for the future.

How do you fire? You tell the female in a short quick and strong fashion that you will not tolerate her behavior anymore. I will tell a female that, "This isn't working out. My time and energy are too valuable to be wasted. Don't contact me again unless you're willing to show that you are going to be a good friend." This is not what I say all the time. I'm very specific and tailor my phrases and actions, according to the situation.

Notice that I actually left room for the female to return. You don't have to actually do that. I just posted that statement because it is an easy sample to work from. I say that you don't have to allow the female to a chance to return because if she is genuinely and highly interested in you, she will take initiative to keep the interaction going and appease you. Consequently, you don't have to fire women who are highly interested in you at all. Chances are that if you have to fire the female then she wasn't as interested in you as you thought because interest begets good behavior.

Firing works best on women who are more dependent upon external stimuli. The are essentially extroverts and need men. Finding out about how her last boyfriend or fuck buddy treated her is important. You will be able to tailor you move to level of intensity that she received from the last guy who kept her around a while. For females that are less dependent upon men and sex, you want to give them warnings to a well.

You essentially want to check that ho very strongly. Firing is the last type of behavior check I use because you can easily blow through females. You lose most of them anyway. So, read this next statement deep. "I'm quick to fire a ho." I told you that I use it as the last behavior check, but I am quick to use it. The reason is that sometimes firing is your best option. If the female stood you up or backed out on meeting up with you then fire that ho because she is wasting your time. Sometimes I don't fire females for that shit.

Ok, you know firing works when the bitches front comes tumbling down. You'll hear phrases like, "stop being mean", or "you don't normally act this way", or "why are you doing this insert name". At this point you know that your move is working on her and causing sever brain hemorrhaging.

Firing can produce very good results because the female will know that you are willing to walk away. never let the female back if she doesn't apologize. She must apologize. Don't let be just lip service. Sometimes I add after they apologize, "I appreciate your apology, and I want to be its sincerity; however, I would rather she initiative and action because I believe actions are stronger than words. I'm hurt easily because I feel so much, and I need strong reasons to give a person who has hurt another chance because I know history can repeat itself."

Damn, what I just said was so fucking pimp. Write it down. If the female is earnestly trying to earn your favor again than a phrase like that just melts her grey matter, the material tissue of the brain. I've said enough on firing.

If you haven't been using this move of power than get off your ass, and start using it now.

Best of luck. Be Strong. Be Sincere. And you will be showing strong game.



The next topics will "get rude" or "get polite", "projection", "repression", "mystery/statements", "teasing/perversion", "presentation/re-presentation", "suppresion", and "Flight" plus "laughter"

Repression--God's Gift of Psychological Destruction

I looked around for psychoanalytic work on Repression. Sadly, I could not find any work that was directly related to this topic. Many authors have wrote about Repression, but the have wrote about self-repression, something that we don't care to do here. We want to repress other people. We need to repress other people because repression builds desire.

Repression builds desire because it puts weight and force against that which a person wants or needs. Let me be very clear. Repression acts like a torrent of oppressive force that cracks the mind into filling the split skull with the effects of power. Lust, curiosity, desire, happiness, fear, and motivation can all be produced from repression. I urge caution in using repression in females that like you. It is dangerous if she is very attached to you because it produces so much desire.

Repression used in females that don't even like you builds respect and qualities of curiosity. Most males do not repress women. Society just believes we live in this patriarchal society that automatically represses women's desires etc. This is not the case. Men generally seek to fulfill ambiguous and not fully formed desires because they don't understand how to manifest the concreteness of desire.

This is exactly what repression does. Repression makes known what cannot be had. This is through forcing a female to get rude or get polite. This is another topic that we will come to later on; however, repression is our focus. Repression works by created artificially constructed barriers and boundaries that should not be crossed, but women have a hard time not crossing these boundaries because you erected them; she begins to have concrete desires, wants, and needs from these barriers. What happens is that these elements whatever they may be are not fulfilled. So, since you are the person not fulfilling these tangible and intangible wants, needs, and desires she attributes these positive feelings to you. Essentially the female, in her mind, transforms these boundaries onto the very flesh and skin wrapped around your increasingly sexy body. This transposing doesn't even need to be done face-to-face, but we all know face-to-face interactions are better than the phone text message or call.

The way we achieve repression is through varied forms of oppression. First, we can use politeness as a weapon. Realize that we are conditioned to politeness not because it is proper or good, but we are conditioned to accept politeness because it is easier to abide by than to disregard or go against politeness; thus, responses to females conditioned to make her respect politeness comes to bring desire into the male body. If you have ever had a female tell you to be polite it is because she is trying bring oppression on your body and manifest desire in you. No one likes social rules and codes so the enforcement of these rules brings about a desire to break them. Consequently, you may get mad, laugh, agree etc. but you will attribute the feelings that have arisen in your body to the female. If you've ever had a female tell you, while trying to get into her pants, something along the lines of, "wait I'm not comfortable", "slow down", "I'm not ready yet" etc. it is because she attempting to manifest desire and need in your body, so that you graft those feelings onto her flesh.

We can use politeness verbally saying something like, "I would appreciate it if you didn't talk to me in that manner because it is so rude" (used when she's talking dirty), "Please don't call me that. Please call me Remy it's more respectful." (used when she calls you by some pet name), "I'd appreciate it if you ask before you touch me again. Gaining my permission first makes me feel a whole lot more comfortable and makes me feel better, so that I get more pleasure out of entertaining your company" (used when she is touching you whether rough or soft). Do you see the pattern. You stonewall the shit she is doing even if it feels good or is showing good behavior.

What must be realized is the nature of repression. Repression works of social norms and the codified common practices of society. We can even use repression in the reverse of politeness. If a female tells you to be polite or tries to make you appeal to standard practice, you can say, "I would appreciate it if you would refrain from acting that way and saying those things. You are trying to put socially unconscious barriers and ways of acting on me that I don't feel comfortable with. I feel more comfortable when people acting in a natural way, and I respect those people and enjoy my time with them more than people who don't. Enjoying time spent together with another person is more important than social rules and bourgeois practices. You're free to disagree, but this is just the way that I feel."

Repression can be used in gestures that will silently and stealthily change the way people are acting. Using your hands like you're pressing something down while speaking subconsciously communicates that the action or topic or what you are saying is less valuable. When talking about something that you are not interested in with a group of people. This gesture can communicate to the group to switch topics. Try it out. You will be amazed. Do not use this gesture too much because it will become a common practice and lose its effects with the group you're interacting with.

I'm going to refrain from naming all the ways that repression can be used because it would become too long of an essay. You should see the basic framework of repression and understand how it works. I had a hard time grasping repression until I started using it verbally. I now use repression less than I should because I have more tools in the box. Being specific with your 'power tools' is very important. The pun was intended.

Edit:

Future topics: The next topics will "get rude" or "get polite", "projection", "repression", "mystery/statements", "teasing/perversion", "presentation/re-presentation", "suppresion", and "Flight" plus "laughter"

We have a new addition: Cheezits--The Power of Silence--Scooping Up That Delectable Snack

Cheezits and Quietness--The Power of Silence--Scooping Up the Delectable Snack

Silence is cool. Try it some time. Cheezits are cool and tasty try them sometime. Cheezits and Quietness have a lot to do with women. When I use the word Cheezits I'm talking about smiling.

This section on power is dedicated to the application of these two concepts, and the meteoric rise in power associated with using the concepts.

Silence is to achieve. Shut your mouth. When I say shut your mouth, I mean shut your mouth and wait for the movie that is about to ensue. Most women can't handle silences after a good conversation is started. Use this to your advantage. If a female is not doing anything you want or is not as receptive to what you're saying and doing but has interest in you then shut the fuck up and put on a smile. I do not mean a smile that shows teeth. Put on a regular all lip smile or a smug, I know something that you don't know, smile.

This will drive the interested female crazy. Do it about three times at different intervals and you'll see some real magic. A lot of times women will interpret silences as a reason to perform early in the interaction; however, you must remember that silence is ambiguous so she will color the meaning. This is why using silence a lot can be detrimental, but purposeful and thoughtful application of silences is very useful.

I should also mention that cheesing is optional. Cheesing while being silent means that you are enjoying something. Do it too much and you may come across as creepy depending on how she interprets the smiles. The more times she sees it the more the smile becomes ambiguous, unless there is a prevailing theme in your conversation that warrants smiles. I personally only use smiles sometimes, and I avoid using them in later interactions because I my swag is generally aloof, serious, mysterious, and smooth. Smiling can really fuck up the smooth and serious vibe if it breeds some awkward and superfluous laughter.

Usually I just take on this blank stare where I'm looking at everything and nothing at the same time, coupled with silence this shit like a slow moving rock to the head. It hurts and it gets your attention. A lot of times after the female and I have been talking for 20-30+ minutes, I'll start throwing in silences. I watch as she lowers her heads and then re-initiates the conversation. She takes a step closer. She leans or shuffles over more so we're getting closer to being side by side. I like what I see so about 10 minutes later I do it again, but this time I just look her in the eyes with the blankest stare ever.

It's like I'm looking at war crimes that would make the countries that attended the Geneva Convention shiver, curdle, and cry at the brutality and graphic realness, but I look with emotionless curiosity. She asks me what I'm thinking about at this moment. I say, "I think about a lot of stuff all the time. Right now I'm focusing you, and I would like to think that you appreciate it when a person takes an interest in you and gives you their valuable time and energy."

She agrees with me. She tells me how she does that shit with her friends. I say, "I love your enthusiasm and I really appreciate what you're saying because I would like to think that it's true. It's hard to find good friends like that; however, I prefer having you show it me to me. I like experiencing the good things people say they do, first hand. It's why I'm so fond of friends who take initiative with me."

I get real silent. She agrees with what I'm saying, and she attempts to convince me that what she is saying is true. I nod my head in silence. I listen. I say I agree, and I stay silent. She finishes and there is a 15 second silence. I'm giving her the time to analyze me. She's heard my principles and values. She knows my boundaries. Her physical assessment must be shown to me. She's looking at my lips....The silence builds tension.

This is a general pattern of what occurs when I first meet the female. What we can say about silence is that it builds tension. Silence is inherently antagonistic. It is why it is so useful getting messages across to females. The response it produces in men and women is natural. People don't naturally fight. See my earlier post about how society was formed. Because silence is so antagonistic people seek to restore the balance, a social homeostasis, they create an alliance.

Silence doesn't work so well in group settings. The number of actors in the situation creates instances where attention is entirely diluted in your direction. This diluted attention will be shifted to other people when you're silent because there is an implicit group assumption that alliance already exists. You have bonded together in the group and already established the alliance. If we don't naturally want to fight and silence is antagonistic then the only option left for the group to combat antagonistic silence is flight. This is the reason why the quiet guy gets boxed out of the group. This is reason people don't listen to him when he finally chimes in. In a sense, silence can put you odds with the group. The larger the group is the more silence becomes detrimental. In the same sense, the larger the group is the more silent actors there will be.

This is why there is generally no common conversation between groups of 10 or more people. Sub-conversations and sub-alliances are initiated inside the mega-group. This is the manner of re-entry into the group because you have established psuedo-factions. These psuedo-factions increase group cohesiveness because the common goal of solidarity is still achieved. There has been no group fight, but there has been a group restructuring under the entire group umbrella. Transition into other people's conversation is natural because of the general group identity even though there are psuedo-factions. It is about representation. As long as representation is occurs the mega-group will not die until external factors like time, commitments, and problems interfere.

The liquidity of process is so ingrained into the human mind that pseudo-factions will decrease and terminate and then re-initiate for the entire length of time that the whole group spends together. It is funny to note that when the group splits the people who have talked in sub-groups/pseudo-factions usually pair up together. Pay attention to the next you go out with a large group.

The reverse of this process is also true. The smaller the group the more silence can wave its power. In the same way that silence is powerful in less numbers it can be more powerful in larger numbers when the power is set upon a figure head. The leader of the group can establish power with his silence, or the silence of the group can stand antagonistically to the leader of the group; however, this second option occurs less than the first option.

Our final analysis of silence falls into excluded zones. excluded zones are bathrooms, bedrooms, private rooms, VIP sections in restaurants etc. We will focus on the personal room/personal living area. When a female is in your presence in your home staying silent can be a benefit. What I mean is that silence can work to your advantage to get her performing. It is in this special place that alliance does not occur. This is the same issue as when you are in her personal/private area. A silence in your home can produce action. A silence in her home can get you moved out the front door.

Remember, you are transgressing space, and she is transgressing space if she is in your room/home. You will not necessarily get kicked out of her place because silence is natural and supposed to occur in private areas. It is only when silence is used out of hand that it backfires. For example, if you are making out with the female and in the private area then talking is a no go. If you are in a public area and silent, but move to the private area then silence there is wrong. You have moved from silence that creates alliance because it is public into the private realm where authority reigns supreme, and you are daring to challenge it. If you are in your own place then it is not an issue.

I prefer my own place as opposed to female's place because I'm more comfortable in my own room/home. I run shit.

I will start with the female's place and conclude with my and your personal space. The feminine space is just that, feminine. I have stressed throughout the essay the silence is antagonistic, but it produces different effects in different places. Silence is primarily antagonistic, but it is a crucial tool to bring out the elephant in the room. A well placed silence in a female's private area will put you on the path to sex if you so choose. If I do wind up in her place because I decided that it would be better to go that route then I never speak a word when I making moves on her. My principles really keep me from making moves; however, when I was laying pipe down not too long ago I had few principles if any. So, I would just use head nods, head shakes, and shoulder shrugs to communicate when possible so I could avoid saying anything. This is very useful because body language communicates stronger messages than words. When I was talking, I would use silence as a way to establish a connection. I was antagonistic, but I broke the silence early enough to keep the situation from being confrontational. If I didn't like what I was hearing I made it clear that I was prepared to leave at any moment.

Sometimes, I would leave for effect only to have something left behind so I that I had a reason to re-enter. It is funny how often this turns the tide into your favor.

In my private space I have a castle. What I means is that I'm king. I can shut the fuck up for 15 minutes if I please. Since I have not attacked the female, she knows that she is safe in my arena. I usually run the rap about how I don't make the first move, and I say something about how I would prefer if she ask me before she makes a move or makes her move very slowly so that I won't be weirded out. I let her know that if she can follow these rules she can do what she wants in my room, and I let her know that the welcome mat is available as long as she doesn't break the rules. Usually, there are silences before I give this rap. The female may have already raised the issue about sex or sexual play. I go dead silent after I give her the rap so she can have a chance to think about it. Because I'm the authority and I'm silent it is antagonistic in a good way.

She can follow my rules, we're stuck motionless until she follows my rules, or she can leave. Usually, what happens in your personal private space is that the female seeks to align with your authority just like in the public space. This is true if the female likes you. A lot of times with the principles I stated earlier the female tries to make a point in a semi-argumentative way. If she starts this way then I remain silent because it is a facade.

She will beg, and sometimes depending on how I delivered the principles and my speech she will say in all too obvious terms that I have 'consent'. I detest the begging. I stay silent. If she begs first then moves to an argumentative frame I snap into action.

I say something along these lines, "If you are attempting to start an argument with me about this then your sorely mistaken. I'm telling you what I feel in my heart and what I believe. This is what I feel. My area is a safe haven free from critique and judgement. The welcome mat to my doorstep is available as long you can follow my rules. You are welcome to stay so you can find out more about my rules and talk with me to come to a decision. These are part of my principles. If you disagree then you are welcome to leave and then welcome mat will be available again, when you are ready to show me that you are willing to abide by my principles. You have seen that I have few rules, but I have many principles. You may not like my principles, but you will follow the few rules I have. Or, we need not speak until you have a change of heart."

I never walk towards the female when I'm saying what I'm saying. Sometimes I don't even turn towards her because that could incite a deeper argument. When she starts talking what I want to hear I'll silently listen and reward her some way, usually with a kiss. She will then usually take it all the way without much resistance. I like to hear about how she likes me, how she will do what she can to keep me happy, how she enjoys spending time with me, how she appreciates being in my presence, how she recognizes that I'm busy and she values the time that I given her no matter if it comes to a short close, how she wants to support me and what I believe and want etc.

When I start hearing that I sometimes get excited, and I may kiss her on the lips or the cheek, after I give the spiel.

If the female inquires about the principle/rule of mine about not making the first move then I tell her as honest as the dollars I earn from my paycheck that at the time when I did whatever it was that seems to go against my principles and rules that it felt like the right thing to do at the time.

This essay is getting long. I included some extra bits of information and insight into the way that I think. I felt like posting that information was good to do if a person is trying to utilize silence in their own place, in an effective manner. If you do decide to use some of the lines and phrases that I say then make them your own. Have good principles and rules and silence will be your best friend.

I also suggest using silence whenever you can to see what happens. In closed environments, I may not even say hi back to females that say hi to me. I like to see what happens sometimes.

God Speed,

Future topics: The next topics will "get rude" or "get polite", "projection", "mystery/statements", "teasing/perversion", "suppresion", and "Flight" plus "laughter"

Women can handle silence quite well lol. Takes them a lot longer to end silence then us usually

_________________
"The heart is deep beyond all things, and it is the man. Even so, who can know him."

Also I don't ever reveal that I have a thinking mind, you don't want the game to become conscious it has to remain subconscious. My close friends know that I like to break stuff down. But you want to conceal how much you think so everything appears effortless, like you could do a lot more.

_________________
"The heart is deep beyond all things, and it is the man. Even so, who can know him."

You're fucking up. You're scared of silence, she can smell fear on you, and you're still talking to females who don't like you then if the females you are talking to take longer to break silence than you do.

Women who like you will not let the situation get awkward.


They will let silence go for as long it is natural in the interaction. If they let it go longer than they are trying to make a point or they don't like you. If you sit quietly long enough then you will find out which one it is.
This is a contradiction, champ.



You really missed the heart of this article.

There is nothing indicating the way I think embedded in the lines that I offered before I undergo silence.

Pratting a bitch up is game 101.

Have you ever done it?

You fill her head with a ton of bullshit that seems relevant to whatever you're saying and you drop the golden kernel in between the shit sandwich.

For example, "Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah this is why I say that I only feel like having friends right now Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, I don't think any girl would be able to fill all the qualities that I would want to see in a girl friend. Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, I personally think I would be better off without a girl friend. Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, so I like to keep relationships to a friends status. Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah good friends mean a lot to me. Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, so you could definitely become a good friend and mean a lot to me, depending on how you treat me."

Do you see the structure?

That is the structure in every single line I dropped in the silence article. In ten minutes, you tell a girl you only want to be friends, you don't want a girlfriend, you're picky about who can be a girlfriend, and you give her a goal to strive for, being a good friend, treating you nicely etc.

Depending on the avenue that a female takes with me. She knows my principles and structure of what is supposed to happen in relationship within less than one hour to two days.

If you think letting her know your principles and rules and then shutting up so she can think about what you said is giving shit away then you really need to think about what pimping is focusing on in the female mind.
This brings me to my second point.

Pimping is about honesty. If you don't let the female know everything you want to see in her then you are lying to her. You are wasting her time.

From your post honesty does not seem to be the first thing your mind is focused on.

If you are really worried about concealing what you think then you are still scared of 120 pound, sack of flesh females with soft hands and wide hips, human being that is infinitely weaker than you.

About the second half of your response, you do not want to make it seem like you could do more.

Are you out to please the female?............I'm fucking serious.

You want to make it seem like she can do a lot more.

Pimping is about putting them to work. You want to make it seem like you can give her a whole lot of different reasons and ways to make you make.

You want to make it seem like you could be seeing and talking to her a whole lot less.

You under no circumstances want to make it seem like you can do more work. That is just asking for her to flip the balance of power on you. That mindset will actually make you put more effort into the interaction.

Yup.

_________________
"The heart is deep beyond all things, and it is the man. Even so, who can know him."

USING OBSERVATION

I haven't made one of these in a while. Here's something that I ran across.

John Edwards Russell--Elementary Logic

The requisites of Good Observation

To be a good observer three things are especially requisite:

1. accuracy and carefulness in perception
2. power of sustained attention
3. A good memory.

Experiment

Observation alone, even were it ideally perfect, is inadequate to the task of analyzing the situation in which phenomena occur, and ascertaining in these situations what phenomena are causally connected....I will now point out some ways in which experiment aids and supplements observation.

1. Making possible repeated instances of the same phenomena.
2. enabling the observer to isolate the phenomenon under observation.
3. The use of instruments.

Elimination of non-causal circumstances from the totality of conditions in which the phenomenon under investigation happens [serves our purpose].

1. The Method of Agreement- noting what cases where all the instances agree, while they differ in all the other material circumstances; or, noting what single circumstance is always present, and the only one that is always present, when the given phenomenon occurs.

2. The Method of Difference - If an instance in which the phenomenon under investigation occurs and an instance in which it does not occur, have every circumstance in common save one, that one occurring only in the former; the circumstance in which alone the two differ is the effect, or the cause, or an indispensable part of the cause, of the phenomenon.

3. The Joint Method or Method of Double Agreement - The distinctive feature of this method is the double employment of the method of agreement, this method being employed both in the instances in which the phenomenon occurs, and in the instances in which it does not occur. The method thus affords two distinct proofs, each proceeding independently of the other, and each corroborating the other.

4. The Method of Residues - This method is employed in those cases in which some of the concomitants of the phenomenon are already known to be causal antecedents and consequents; and the method consists in subtracting these from the totality of concomitant circumstances, so as to leave as the residuum, the causal antecedents yet to be ascertained.

5. The Method of Concomitant Variation - This method consists in ascertaining what variation in a given phenomenon occurs when a definite variation occurs in some other phenomenon.

Elimination by Agreement - I observe after taking a particular kind of food, I am invariably ill; a careful comparison of all instances in which this result follows shows that the taking of this kind of food is the only material circumstance in which they all agree; I infer from this fact that it is this kind of food that is the cause, or at least in part the cause, of my being made ill.

Elimination by Difference - A man, known to be in good health at a certain moment of time, falls dead; examination discovers that a bullet has penetrated his brain. A mass of gunpowder is in a magazine, a lighted match is put in contact with it, an explosion follows. The sole differencing circumstance in the instances of the man in health, and the man dead, was the bullet in his brain. Likewise in the two instances, that of gundpowder in the magazine, and gunpowder destroyed by explosion, the sole differencing circumstance was the lighted match in contact with the powder. We say the bullet killed the man, and the match caused the explosion.

Elimination by Double Agreement - As an example of the employment of this method, I take the following from Fowler's "inductive logic". A ray of light proceeding from incandescent hydrogen is passed through a prism, and it is invariably found that, in the spectrum thus obtained, there are two bright lines occupying precisely the same position; moreover, rays of white light proceeding from various incandescent substances are passed through incandescent hydrogen and the emergent light is then broken up by a prism.

In the spectra thus obtained, it is found that there are invariably two dark (or under certain circumstances two bright) lines occupying exactly the same position in the spectrum. If we try the same experiments with any other elements than incandescent hydrogen, although we may obtain bright and dark lines, we never find these lines occupying the same position in the spectrum as the two lines in question.

First, by the method of simple agreeement it is shown that the ray passing through incandescent hydrogen and the invariable position of certain lines in the spectrum are causally connected things, since this passing through incandescent hydrogen is the sole agreeing circumstance in the instances in which the phenomenon occurs. Secondly, it is shown by the same method applied to the negative instances that the absence of a ray passing through incandescent hydrogen is the sole antecedent on which the non-occurence of this phenomen is observed.

Elimination by Residues - The classic illustration of this method is the discovery of the planet Neptune. The facts are briefly these: Certain perturbations in the planet Uranus had been observered since 1804. IT was known what amount of perturbation in the motions of this planet was due to the influence of known heavenly bodies. Deducting the effects of the known influence of these other bodies, there remained the perturbations for which a cause was to be discovered; and as the student probably knows, Mr. Adams in England and M. Le Verrier in France almost simultaneously calculated the position of some planetary body which could occasion these disturbances in the motions of Uranus. Dr. Gill of the Royal Academy of Berlin turned his telescope to that region of the heavens, and discovered the planet Neptune.

Elimination by Concomitant Variation - A good example of this method are some observations upon the grip epidemic in New York, made by Weather Forecaster Dunn. Mr. Dunn came to the conclusion, that humidity with change in temperature was the most important element in causing the spread of the disease. The facts on which this inference was based are the following:

1. The fatality was most marked when the humidity was at its maximum, and there was a sudden fall of the temperature.
2. The higher the humdity and the more sudden the fall of temperature, the greater was the number of deaths.
3. When, on the other hand, the temperature and the humidity dropped at the same time, there was a decrease in the death rate.

Elimination by Agreement and Difference - This method differs from the method of agreement only in the circumstance that it takes account of negative as well as positive instances of the given phenomenon; that is, instances in which the phenomenon does not occur as well as those in which that phenomenon occurs.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of this article is coming soon to a forum near you.

Logic is power.

"Men use their knowledge to find the truth. Women use their love to find men who know the truth." - unknown author

I GOT SOMETHING COMING FOR THAT ASS IF YOU'VE BEEN FOLLOWING THIS THREAD.

THE ANALYSIS OF THE PREVIOUS LOGIC POST WILL BE POSTPONED. IF YOU READ THE ARTICLE YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO DEDUCE BASIC SITUATIONS OF INTEREST IN YOUR FAVOR WITH WOMEN.

BEFORE YOU READ THE NEXT TOPIC PLEASE VIEW THIS THREAD:

http://www.naturalfreedom.info/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2010

LOOK FOR A FEW VERBAL CONCEPTS THE KIDD USES IN THE POST.


Future topics: The next topics will "get rude" or "get polite", "projection", "mystery/statements", "teasing/perversion", "suppresion", and "Flight" plus "laughter"

THE BASICS OF VERBAL MANIPULATION, DISCIPLINE, AND PUNISHMENT: HANDBOOK OF VERBAL KUNGFOO