Natural Freedom

Forum for the natural awakening and self-realization of men
It is currently Wed Dec 19, 2018 12:10 pm

All times are UTC+01:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Smooth Operating
PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2018 3:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 1:41 am
Posts: 204
Location: Greece
Smooth Operating: A Structural Analysis of Social Behavior (SASB) Perspective on Initial Romantic Encounters
Social Psychological and Personality Science
Published: August 3, 2010
DOI: 10.1177/1948550610373402

Abstract
The present report used the comprehensive structural analysis of social behavior (SASB) observational coding scheme to examine which behaviors differentiate smooth from awkward initial romantic encounters.
Participants on speed-dates rated as smooth (by independent observers) behaved more warmly and were more other-focused than participants on awkward dates.
In addition, participants on smooth dates tended to avoid extremes on the autonomy dimension, exhibiting neither strong independence from nor strong interdependence with their speed-dating partners.
Furthermore, the manner in which participants were self-focused (but not other-focused) reliably differentiated smooth from awkward dates;
that is, date smoothness strongly predicted how participants reacted to their speed-dating partners (type of self-focus) but only weakly predicted how participants acted toward their speed-dating partners (type of other-focus).
Finally, the authors note SASB’s potential to serve as an overarching framework that explains why some interactions go well and others do not.
Quote:
Indeed, smoothness is perhaps the central component of communication quality, and it correlates highly with conversational satisfaction and attraction to one’s interaction partner.

For example, warm people tend to have initial interactions of higher self- and observer-rated quality.
Furthermore, expressions of warmth tend to elicit warmth from interaction partners in turn, and such affiliative cues lead interaction partners to want to meet again in the future.

Results

On the other-focused circumplex, participants had significantly more active love codes on the smooth dates.
An active love code is a warm, partner-focused statement that communicates no attempt to either control or emancipate the partner; in the speed-dating context, flirting is a prototypical active love behavior.
Participants also had significantly fewer ignore codes on the smooth dates.
An ignore code is a statement that indicates an active refusal to respond to the partner, often with a cool indifference.
Thus, in terms of how participants acted toward their speed-dating partners, dates were smoother to the extent that participants made warm gestures that were intermediate on the autonomy dimension and did not actively neglect their partners.

Intriguingly, most of the significant differences emerged for the self-focused circumplex, where all but one of the codes significantly differed between the smooth and awkward dates.
Participants had fewer separate codes on smooth dates; these codes indicate an attempt to create distance between the self and the partner by asserting one’s autonomy.
Participants had more disclose codes on smooth dates, which indicate a warm attempt to connect with the other person by sharing personal information, as well as more reactive love codes, which are exceptionally warm responses that indicate that the participant is enjoying the interaction (e.g., laughter).
Interestingly, participants had fewer trust codes on the smooth dates relative to the awkward dates.
Although trust codes are typically associated with positive interpersonal outcomes, trust codes in this first date situation often indicated that the participant felt vulnerable and was relying on the partner to carry the date.
Similarly, participants had fewer submit codes on the smooth dates, which frequently indicated that the participant was apathetically going along with the conversation.
Finally, participants had fewer wall-off codes on the smooth dates, a code that indicates that the participant is coolly withdrawing, tuning out, or shutting down.

Discussion

Regarding the three main dimensions of the SASB model, participants on smooth dates (as rated by independent coders) tended to be warmer and more other-focused than participants on awkward dates.

Dates were smoother when participants maintained an intermediate amount of independence versus interdependence with their interaction partners.

The behaviors that mattered most in determining a date’s quality were not those that characterized how participants acted toward their speed-dating partners but rather the behaviors that characterized how participants reacted to their speed-dating partners.
This finding is somewhat counterintuitive, as one might assume that the key ingredient for making a good impression is focusing on an interaction partner properly—grab his or her attention, use the right pickup line, and ask provocative questions.
The present data suggest that how one reacts to the partner is perhaps even more important for achieving good romantic outcomes.
Do you express yourself without boldly asserting your independence from your interaction partner?
Do you react warmly without relying on the partner to maintain the flow of the date?
Do you maintain an active role in the conversation and avoid withdrawing or tuning out?
According to the present data, these would be some of the most important prescriptions for those who wish to have a smooth first date.

A second limitation of this research is that it did not identify the source of the differences between the smooth and awkward dates.
That is, why did participants on some dates exhibit active love (i.e., flirt) with each other, whereas participants on other dates separated from each other?
Was it because the speed-daters possessed skills or personality traits that caused them to engage in more of these particular behaviors, or was it because the mixture of two speed-daters’ personalities happened to produce a smooth or awkward blend?
Given that componential analyses typically find that healthy amounts of variance are attributable to both person-level and relationship-level variables in initial interactions, it is likely that both explanations have some validity.
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/ ... 10SPPS.pdf

_________________
A sane person to an insane society must appear insane.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Smooth Operating
PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2018 3:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 1:41 am
Posts: 204
Location: Greece
Behavioral cues of interpersonal warmth
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published: November 1972
DOI: 10.1037/h0033367

Abstract
Attempted to define interpersonal warmth in behavioral terms by determining the association between global ratings of warmth and objective measures of specific behavioral cues. 18 male and 18 female undergraduates made ratings of the interpersonal warmth of 16 other students from videotaped interviews. These ratings were then related to measures of the interviewees' (a) frequency of verbal expression of positive feelings toward self, others, and surroundings; (b) speech rate; and (c) frequency of smiling and of head and body movement. A multiple correlation of .89 indicated that the 7 behavioral cues accounted for 79% of the variance of the warmth ratings. Those cues most closely related to warmth ratings were (a) frequency of smiling, the single best predictor; and (b) number of positive statements about other people. A factor analysis identified 2 factors, the 1st an evaluative one of positive response to others and the 2nd an activity level factor. Warmth is tentatively defined as positive response to others, actively conveyed.

http://psycnet.apa.org/record/1973-04381-001

The Kidd!! wrote: *
enelkei wrote:
Thanks. BTW, is that how u appear in real life? ( your avatar is all serious), :lol: , do you walking around lookin like a bitch done shot you through hot grease? :lol:
Actually I am quite pleasant and easy to talk to...you'll always attract more flies with honey than vinegar. ;)
viewtopic.php?f=21&t=649&p=5422#p5422

_________________
A sane person to an insane society must appear insane.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Smooth Operating
PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2018 4:45 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 12:08 pm
Posts: 3027
Location: UK
zogler wrote: *
A second limitation of this research is that it did not identify the source of the differences between the smooth and awkward dates.
That is, why did participants on some dates exhibit active love (i.e., flirt) with each other, whereas participants on other dates separated from each other?
Value

or rather relative perceived value levels

Will come back to these

_________________
In building a statue, a sculptor doesn't keep adding clay to his subject.He keeps chiseling away at the inessentials until the truth of its creation is revealed without obstructions. Perfection is not when there is no more to add,but no more to take away.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to: 

cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited